Printable version of the document in PDF format.
1997.
GVH`S PROCEEDINGS ENDED WITH THE DECISION OF THE COMPETITION COUNCIL
1. OVERVIEW
|
Number of cases Fines imposed for failed notifications (1000 HUF) |
% of cases |
Imposed fines (1000 HUF) |
% of fines |
Fines imposed for failed notifications (1000 HUF) | |
Abuse of dominant position |
28 |
4 |
16.7 |
11,000 |
20.0 |
- |
Abusive |
24 |
4 |
16.7 |
11,000 |
20.0 |
- |
Restrictive |
3 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
Composite and other |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
Restrictive agreements |
5 |
1 |
4.2 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
Horizontal |
3 |
1 |
4.2 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
Vertical |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
Composite and other |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
Concentrations |
25 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
0 |
Horizontal |
21 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
0 |
Vertical |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
0 |
Composite and other |
3 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
0 |
Antitrust cases altogether |
58 |
5 |
20.8 |
11,000 |
20.0 |
0 |
Consumer fraud |
50 |
19 |
79.2 |
44,050 |
80.0 |
- |
Delusion of consumers |
47 |
19 |
79.2 |
44,050 |
80.0 |
- |
Restricting the choice of the consumer |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
Composite |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
All cases |
108 |
24 |
100.0 |
55,050 |
100.0 |
0 |
% of cases |
100,0 |
22.2 |
|
|
|
|
Printable version of the document in PDF format.
2. DETAILS
2.1. Unfair manipulation of consumers` choice
|
Number of cases [2] |
% of cases |
Establishment of the infringement |
14 |
29.8 |
Termination after suspension |
5 |
10.6 |
GVH`s intervention |
19 |
40.4 |
Other terminations |
30 |
59.6 |
Other |
1 |
0.0 |
Cases altogether |
50 |
100.0 |
Fines related to GVH`s intervention (1000 HUF) |
44050 |
|
Number of cases ended with imposition of fine |
8 |
|
Printable version of the document in PDF format.
2.2. Abuse of dominant position
|
Abusive [3] |
Restrictive [4] |
Altogether [6] |
% of cases | |
Establishment of the infringement |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
14.3 |
Termination of proceedings after suspension |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
GVH`s intervention altogether |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
14.3 |
Termination of proceedings without suspension |
20 |
3 |
1 |
24 |
85.7 |
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Cases altogether |
24 |
3 |
1 |
28 |
100.0 |
% of cases |
85.7 |
10.7 |
3.6 |
100.0 |
|
Imposed fines (1000 HUF) |
11,000 |
0 |
0 |
11,000 | |
% of fines imposed |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
100.0 | |
Number of cases ended with imposition of fine |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
Printable version of the document in PDF format.
2.3. Restrictive agreements
|
Horizontal [7] |
Vertical [8] |
Composite [9] |
Altogether [10] |
% of cases |
Initiated ex officio |
% of cases initiated ex officio |
Illegal agreements |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Termination of proceedings after suspension |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Conditional exemption |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Voluntary acceptance of the proposal of GVH |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
GVH`s interventions altogether |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Individual exemptions |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
40.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 | |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
40.0 |
0 |
0.0 | |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 | |
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Cases altogether |
3 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
100.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
% of cases |
60.0 |
40.0 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
| ||
Not notificated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | |||
Withdrawal of block exemption |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | |||
Initiated ex officio |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | |||
% of cases initiated ex officio |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 | |||
Fines imposed by GVH (1000 HUF) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | |||
% of fines |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 | |||
Fines imposed for the failure of notification the agreement (1000 HUF) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | |||
Cases ended with imposition of fines |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Printable version of the document in PDF format.
2.4. Concentrations
|
Horizontal [14] |
Vertical [15] |
Composite and other [16] |
Altogether [17] |
% of cases |
Initiated ex officio |
% of cases initiated ex officio |
Prohibition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Conditional approval |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Voluntary acceptance of the proposal of GVH |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
GVH`s interventions altogether |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Other refusals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Approvals |
19 |
1 |
3 |
23 |
92.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
8.0 |
0 |
0.0 | |
Other terminations of the proceedings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Cases altogether |
21 |
1 |
3 |
25 |
100.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
% of cases |
84.0 |
4.0 |
12.0 |
100.0 |
| ||
Not notificated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | |||
Initiated ex officio |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | |||
% of cases initiated ex officio |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 | |||
Fines imposed for the lack of notification (1000 HUF) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | |||
% of fines imposed for the lack of notification |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Footnotes
-
Depending on the type of the case, GVH (Hungarian competition authority) interventions might result in different types of decisions:
- establishment of the infringement: applied in all types of cases (However the category of `failure to notify the concentration` is not included although these are also infringements of the Competition Act. This influence the overall number of infringements and fines.)
- termination of proceedings after suspension: applied in all types of cases (except the concentrations)
- refusal of the exemption: applied in the case of restrictive agreements
- prohibited concentrations (refused notifications): applied in the case of concentrations and restrictive agreements
- imposition of condition: applied in the case of restrictive agreements and concentrations
- voluntary acceptance of the reflections of GVH: applied in the case of concentrations and restrictive agreements -
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement
-
Termination of proceedings by formal decision in cases initiated ex officio.
-
Termination of proceedings by formal decision in cases initiated ex officio.
-
Termination of proceedings by formal decision in cases initiated ex officio.
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement.
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement.
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement.
-
Cases in which the decesions were taken in more than one matter are represented in the table according to the most serious infringement.
-
Termination of proceedings by formal decision in cases initiated ex officio.